Radiometric dating blind test

In 1972 this assumption was shown to be highly questionable.

Despite this, the momentum gained in the two decades prior to 1972 has made 4.5 b.y.

“For example, the radioactive decay of uranium in tiny crystals in a New Mexico granite yields a uranium-lead ‘age’ of 1.5 billion years.

”[xiii] So if radiometric dating doesn’t even work on things of known age, is it reliable to determine accurate dates for things of unknown ages?There are many assumptions that have to be made when using radiometric dating methods that might make these techniques unreliable.If any of these assumptions are wrong, then the reliability of the testing method can and should be put in question.Their strong bias for a very old universe causes them to make assumptions that will favor their bias.” “Professor Richard Arculus assumes that 6.5 billion years ago supernovae created most of the uranium for our planet.He bases this on the belief that the earth is 4.5 billion years old and that the production ratio of U-235 and U-238 in a supernova is about 1.65.

Leave a Reply